Thursday, March 12, 2020

Week 8


Reflection on one of the Frameworks/Models of Education Transformation


This week we focused on Chapters 3 and 4 in the book, "The Edtech Advocate's Guide to Leading Change in Schools" by Mark Gura. The focus of these chapters is on the digital transformation of schools through frameworks and tools. Several frameworks were briefly discussed such as Microsoft's Education Transformation Framework, Intel's Education Transformation Technology Adoption Blueprint, SAMR Model, and the TPACK Framework.

The Model that resonates with me is the SAMR Model because it moves up from the bottom layer increasing the technology transformation as it goes. Dr. Ruben Puentedura created this model and categorizes four types of technology integration in the classroom; substitution, augmentation, modification, and redefinition.



The first or lowest area of technology integration is Substitution. With substitution, you are just replacing a tool with another one. An example of this would have students write on paper and then have them write in Microsoft Word. You are just substituting the task with a different tool.

The next area above substitution is Augmentation. This is taking the substitution part and adding extra services like having students use the Microsoft Word document and importing it into a Google Doc and then using Spell Check or the thesaurus with their document. The first 2 areas involve the process of transforming education. The next 2 areas branch into enhancements.

The third area of technology integration is Modification. Modification allows technology to be used more effectively with redesigning tasks. An example would use the Google Document and incorporate the comment feature for students to collaborate on the assignment.

The final step of technology integration is Redefinition. Redefinition uses the highest order of thinking skills to create new tasks or a new experience for the student. An example of this would take the google document and have students create a presentation with their document.

I like that the SAMR model is easy to identify where my technology integration falls into. For me-the hardest part is coming up with the ideas for the redefinition phase. I can easily work the first 3 areas into technology integration, but the fourth area-I need ideas. I just can't envision what or how to make the technology integration move to a higher-order thinking level. I need to continue to investigate further ideas that support the fourth area of the SAMR model.




No comments:

Post a Comment